Tuesday, February 19, 2008
● The Story of STUFF! with Annie Leonard
● ● ● The Story of STUFF! ● ● ● with Annie Leonard
● ● ● The Story of STUFF! ● ● ● with Annie Leonard
http://storyofstuff.com
From extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of production and consumption patterns. The Story of Stuff exposes connections between environmental and social issues, and calls us to create a more sustainable and just world.
We have bought into a system, in which buying stuff is our ultimate purpose. We have to change this system. ...first through awareness... then ultimately, to sustainability. Buying less of what we don't need is always important, but the ultimate goal is sustainability. And this goal, we must demand. ...renewable energy, sustainability of products and production - [ Production without Destruction. ]
● Wal-Mart & Nike: Child Labor
way to lowering standards around the world.
Charles Kernaghan interviewed by Harold Channer
Conversations with Harold Hudson Channer
MNN (Manhattan Neighborhood Network) NYC
Charles Kernaghan, Director of the National Labor Committee, an independent, non-profit human rights organization focused on the protection of worker rights (primarily in Central America, the Caribbean, China and other developing countries).
Charles Kernaghan - Air Date: 02-27-02
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4ZyD9PZcGy0
Kernaghan has led numerous fact-finding missions to Central America and the Caribbean to investigate working conditions in the free trade zones.
National Labor Committee is now
Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights
Tel: (412) 562-2406
Fax: (412) 562-2411
E-mail: inbox@glhr.org
Website: http://globallabourrights.org/about
He does not support boycotts (because workers in the developing world need their jobs) but argues for putting pressure on companies to respect the laws that are already in place. If the existing laws are observed; violations will have consequences, workers will have rights, they will be able to organize, and the levels of working conditions and wages will be raised.
Thursday, February 14, 2008
● RESIST G.M. FOODSTUFF
| ● ● ● ... ... | |
....-Michael Pollan
.................................and
● The Omnivore’s Dilemma. Author Michael Pollan advises, “Don’t Buy Any Food You’ve Ever Seen Advertised.”
Michael Pollan, one of the nation’s leading thinkers and writers on food. The author of several books about food, including The Botany of Desire, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, and In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto, warns of the processed food industry’s co-option of “sustainability” and its vast spending on marketing, Pollan advises to be wary of any food that’s advertised.
"The CDC, Centers for Disease Control, estimates that of the $2 trillion we’re spending on healthcare in this country, $1.5 trillion is for the treatment of preventable chronic disease. Now, that’s not all food, because you have smoking in there, too, and alcoholism. But the bulk of it is food." -Michael Pollan
"The most salient point is simply, [we] are not going to be able to tackle either the healthcare crisis or climate change unless [we] look at our food system. In the case of climate change, food is responsible for about a third of greenhouse gases, the way we’re growing food, the way we’re processing it and the way we’re eating. And the healthcare crisis... ...we are not going to be able to reform healthcare, which depends on getting the cost of healthcare down, without addressing... ...the catastrophe of the American diet. So we need to address it. It’s really the shadow issue over these other two issues." -Michael Pollan
omni·vore |ˈämnəˌvôr|
noun
an animal or person that eats food (or foodstuff)
of both plant and animal origin.
ORIGIN late 19th cent.: from French, from Latin omnivorus ‘omnivorous.’
. . .
food·stuff |foōd·stəf|
noun
A substance with some foodlike qualities that can be used or prepared for use as food, but generally lacks the health benefits of real food.
. . .
On Democracy Now February 13, 2008 consuming today is not food but “edible food-like substances.” His previous book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals, was named one of the ten best books of 2006 by the New York Times and the Washington Post. His latest book, just published, is called In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto.
| WATCH LISTEN | Real Video Stream More Info... |
. . .
You say potātō,
I say genetically modified foodstuff.
I agree with Michael Pollan, in that what most Americans are consuming today is not food but “edible food-like substances.” I've often said that we shouldn't even have to have the term "health food", since food by definition should already be healthy. Unfortunately, the categorizes have been reversed, where pancakes, potatochips, and cheeseburgers are considered to be real food, while carrots and celery are considered to be rabbit food, hence not real food.
I also agree that thinking about food in terms of Nutrition defined by "the experts" can be misleading. Although, I think if we redefine nutrition to mean whole organic foods (usually plants) then it does serve a purpose. Most people that I've talked to don't really care that much about nutrition, maybe for the reasons discussed by Michael Pollan. Maybe people intuitively know there's a problem with nutritional science, so they ignore the whole idea of whether or not, what they're consuming is "good or bad" for them. Or, they just don't care because culture and tradition trump nutrition almost every time. Every time, that is, until they merge, which they increasingly are. But right now "nutrition" is the dysfunctional way, in which we make these health decisions about our eating habits, if we make these decisions at all.
My opinion varies from Michael Pollan a little on a small point, where he claims that people are eating or shopping in an effort to advance their health. This is true to a degree, but from my experience, people still eat according to how and where they were raised. It's just that, culture has been taken over by capital. It is the influence of big business on culture and nutritional science that is the problem. Michael Pollan recognizes this point. The difference in my opinion from his is simply that he sees this as a turning away from culture and pleasure, where I see it as a cultural shift, and manufactured wants replacing genuine pleasure.
Most people still do eat according to their culture, but the dominant cultures in the U.S. are increasingly influenced and determined by unregulated market forces. Yet, another example of what deregulated markets should not determine. Maybe the health of our bodies is in direct proportion to the health of our economic system. With regulations that only protect capital and not consumers, seeds that don't reproduce, and genetic modification, now not even our fruits and vegetables are safe. Fortunately, there's a growing resistance to this trend and the only question is whether or not we will be informed and act in time.
Also see:
● Campaign against Genetically Modified Organisms
● Monsanto: Planting Local Seeds, Sprouting Global Effects
| ✿ > ☠ foodstuff ... YOU SAY TOMĀTŌ, I SAY RĒSIST ! ...or genetically modified edible food-like substance. |
Sunday, January 20, 2008
● “Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (And Stick You with the Bill)”
David Cay Johnston reveals how government subsidies and new regulations have quietly funneled money from the poor and the middle class to the (politically connected) rich.
LISTEN | |
Thursday, January 3, 2008
● Resident Bush's Last Day in Office Countdown Clock
residency |ˈrez(ə)dənsē; ˈrezəˌdensē|
noun ( pl. -cies)
• the fact of living in a place : a government ruling allowed the right to residency.
• a residential post held by a person.
resident |ˈrez(ə)dənt; ˈrezəˌdent|
noun
a person who lives somewhere permanently or on a long-term basis.
• a bird, Bush, butterfly, or other animal of a species that does not migrate or travel abroad.
• a person who boards at a boarding school.
• historical a British government agent in any semi-independent state, esp. the governor general's agent at the court of an Indian state.
adjective
living somewhere on a long-term basis : he has been resident in the White House for a long time.
• living at a school, office, or institution : resident students.
• (of a computer program, file, etc., such as, a virus implanted, spread on the DIEBOLD TOUCH-SCREEN VOTING MACHINES ) immediately available in computer memory, rather than having to be loaded from elsewhere.
DERIVATIVES
residentship |-ˌ sh ip| noun ( historical).
ORIGIN Middle English : from Latin resident- ‘remaining,’ from the verb residere (see RESIDE ).
--------------Thesaurus---------------
resident
noun
the residents of D.C. INHABITANT, local, citizen, native; townsfolk, townspeople; householder, homeowner, occupier, tenant; formal denizen.
adjective
1 is he currently resident in The White House? LIVING, residing, in residence; formal dwelling.
2 a resident governor LIVE-IN, living in.
--------------U:RESIST.COM---------------
for anti-fascist, anti-neo-con, anti-totalitarian political t-shirts visit uresist.com
Thursday, December 20, 2007
● The Impeachment of Dick Cheney
These charges are too serious to ignore.
It is the constitutional duty of Congress to hold impeachment hearings.
Take a look at this website. Some people in congress are trying to get the impeachment hearings going. You can send an email to support them.
http://wexlerwantshearings.com
Date / Time: 12/20/2007 9:00 PM
Category: Politics
Call-in Number: (646) 716-7543
The Impeachment...
Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL), Bob Fertik (Democrats.com), Dave Lindorff (Case for Impeachment, Counterpunch Magazine) and David Swanson (AfterDowningStreet) join them to talk about impeachment hearings for Vice President Dick Cheney.
http://wexlerwantshearings.com
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/fpc/2007/12/21/The-Impeachment
BlogTalkRadio - The Impeachment of Dick Cheney
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/fpc
. . .
now on
Sunday, December 9, 2007
● [ 1913: READ THEIR LIPS. ]
[ 1913: READ THEIR LIPS. ] This shirt design has multiple references. 1. G.H.W.Bushs slogan "Read my lips, no new taxes.", 2. The Federal Reserve Act, and 3. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that the Sixteenth Amendment allows for no new tax laws. 1913 READ THEIR LIPS ...and hear them lie. learn more... | |
|---|---|
1913 READ THEIR LIPS. Junior's Jersey Tee (AA Brand) 100% soft jersey cotton tee by American Apparel., black sweatshop-free tee | 1913 READ THEIR LIPS. Men's Jersey Tee Men's soft cotton jersey tee by American Apparel., asphalt sweatshop-free tee |
Saturday, December 8, 2007
● M I S S I O N:
...to take an active role in the dialogue for peace, freedom, and human rights. ...to participate in developing nonviolent cultures, in which everyday attire becomes a conversation for social justice... ........to be...
...... ...a conversation piece for peace.
Friday, December 7, 2007
● A B O U T:
.......[. and . |kənˈsep sh ən| .]
U:RESIST® is a company that has developed out of the growing global resistance movement. We aim to express an opinion resistant to power, outside their corporate media (propaganda machine) bias, and within the realm of truth.
As the global elite wreak their will upon the masses with their institutions of control (the World Bank, IMF, and the World Trade Organization), a global grassroots resistance movement is growing, made up of individuals, non-profit organizations, ethical small businesses, independent media, and a concerned citizenry.
A B O U T:
U:RESIST is a socially conscious clothing line and online store that creates and sells products and clothing that exhibit printed art, design, and information (messages, questions, and slogans) inspired or driven by the important issues (economic, social, and environmental) of our time. We are by no means perfect, but we are always taking steps to improve our vision and practice. In terms of ethical business practices, we are increasing the amount of sweatshop-free / eco-friendly manufacturing in our shop. Our vision comes out of an open minded attempt to continually achieve a more objective, factually based, unselfish point of view. This is the inspiration for our design and the force which drives our business. These are all of great importance to us, but above all, promoting positive political and social change is our priority.
U:RESIST® is concerned with promoting a message of resistance.
Resistance to:- corporate media propaganda
- private control over public resources
- and other abuses of power
Change occurs in increments, and it is the direction of change that is of most importance. Unfortunately, between the first steps and the last we could all be considered hypocrites for engaging in contradictory behavior. This "all or nothing" attitude tends to stops change before it starts. The facts are that individuals and businesses do not change over night, and U:RESIST® along with the majority of the resistance movement realizes that the main focus be put on the direction and pace of change, more so than self-righteous condemnations.
Also, (not to minimize individual responsibility) we believe that those in power, at the top of the corporate hierarchy, with all the advantages and resources, have little or no excuse, and should be subject to harsher criticism than small businesses and individuals in the middle / lower income brackets, who are more victims than culprits of a corrupt system.We believe that change will occur more quickly and effectively with an attempt to encourage positive efforts rather than overly criticizing the ill informed. For instance, rather than attacking people who feel they have to shop at Walmart, encourage them to call there congressman and vote to make unethical business practices illegal. Of course, redirecting people to better alternatives is certainly a good idea, but we believe (although consumer choice is very important) small businesses and ethical businesses will not be able to compete until certain business practices are made illegal and the public takes back the airwaves. Without an informed citizenry in the US we will certainly lose our liberities.
In order to resist corporate rule, we will most likely have to do it through the democratic process. Voting with your dollars can be effective sometimes, but it's not very democratic, as rich people have more votes. That is why we believe that the most important action U:RESIST® can make right now is through promoting awareness.
So make your resistance part of your everyday life.We believe that our slogan "WEAR YOUR RESISTANCE" is much more than just a business catchphrase, that the meaning behind it is truly important and possibly vital to democracy and freedom. When you make a choice between free advertizing for corporate rule or making your political stance a part of your everyday life, this is no insignificant matter. The choice between wearing a big business corporate logo or a conversation piece for restoring our liberties can be vital to the direction of society. Billions of dollars are spent on advertising, millions on subtle reminders to buy products. Big business knows how important advertising is, so let us use this same philosophy to promote peace and social justice, to resist corporate rule and restore a working democracy.
Share your resistance by wearing your resistance....